End Citizens United Creates a Poll to Analyze the Involvement of Russia and the American Opinion

A few years ago, in the year of 2010, there was a federal election commission where the landmark named “Citizens United” was approved. It changed the American elections in a way that, now, all the future candidacies would be able to have candidates directly supporting their favorite candidates and their campaigns with massive proportions of money without any limit or pushback.

 

 

This new landmark has put an end to the transparency and honesty of the American elections, and now it is rather a game of interests than real people trying to fight for a better country and lead the Americans to the path that they think is the right one.

 

 

End Citizens United is a Political Action Committee, or “PAC,” that aims to put a stop to this mess that has become the American elections.

 

 

Since the inauguration of the PAC, the group has made tons of progress and has conquered the confidence and support of thousands of donors and Americans wanting the landmark to be changed, reformed or simply closed completely.

 

 

The End Citizens United committee has been able to support the elections of many Democrats running candidacies in the United States, in a way that they try to prove a point by showing the problem at first hand: By funding their pro-reform Democrats and their campaigns with massive chunks of money from grassroot donors, they raise awareness of the problem of allowing committees, investors, and billionaires but their dirty money in the American elections and corrupt the whole system.

 

 

The End Citizens United has proven countless times their intentions into making the American elections as transparent and realistic as possible. For example, in May 2017, the PAC has raised a poll asking Americans if they would want a research to be conducted studying and analyzing the involvement of Russia in the 2016 Elections and the candidacy of Trump deeply. There are many conspiracies about the involvement of Russia in the elections of that year, and one of the issues that have caused the lack of evidence about the participation of that nation is the landmark Citizens United that has made the political events very hard to keep track.

 

 

The poll has resulted in 61% of American citizens wanting an independent investigation to be conducted. The primary cause of this margin is the fact that President Trump has fired the team responsible for the investigation, FBI Director James Comey, which has made many Americans start second-guessing the intentions of their new President and what he has to hide.

 

 

52% of Americans believe there was involvement from the Russian politicians.

 

 

The poll also indicates a significant disapproval of how the Presidency of Donald Trump is handling the country. The majority of Americans are very discontent with their President, and many of the members of the PAC are wondering if part of the reason why Trump got elected in the first place was the dirty hands of investors and magnates in promoting the election of Donald Trump in the 2016 elections.

Everyone Likes Choice, and So Does Betsy DeVos

In a recent LA Times op-ed, “Why not give Betsy DeVos and school vouchers a try?”

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/readersreact/la-ol-le-devos-vouchers-20170218-story.html, Jerry Glass astutely challenges hysterical accusations that Betsy DeVos’s appointment to President Trump’s cabinet is a “threat to democracy”. Although the school system is not an actual democracy, what is more democratic than letting parents and guardians make choices about their child’s education?

As a retired educator, I have taught in public schools and later in my career, in a school of choice. It’s evident that Ms. Devos’ championship of vouchers is a real threat–but only to some tenured teachers who just want to do the minimum and ride out their time till retirement gossiping in the teacher’s lounge. It’s also a matter of money. Failing public schools are terrified of losing funding, and teacher’s unions are scared of losing power. The truth is that when parents have choices everyone wins, particularly the child who benefits from a better investment in his or her future.

Ms. DeVos knows about the importance of investing in education. She and her husband, Dick DeVos, have used their foundation (dbdvfoundation.org) as a vehicle to promote Charter School education. Some notable causes that have received funds are Success Academy Charter Schools and GREAAT Schools, Inc. a management company that oversees Charter Schools.

Betsy DeVos speaks out about the flaws in some of the traditional policies that have left many a child behind in the name of doing the opposite. Education is should be a synergistic cooperative involving all stakeholders.

It’s true that the DeVos’ have donated funds to support private universities and Christian schools, however, they have also supported The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. Having served as a board member, Betsy DeVos understands the importance of fostering the arts in education. You don’t have to teach for twenty years to see what is working and what hasn’t in our current system.

The DeVos foundation has also helped support Institute for Justice, a legal firm involved in school choice lawsuits. For too long, parents without private funds have been excluded from making informed school choices for their children. This is particularly true for minority students and children living in disadvantaged conditions. If their schools are failing, something is wrong. We can’t hide our head in the sand and hope these problems sort themselves out. There isn’t time–our children’s futures teeter in the balance.

If we fear honest conversations and unbiased evaluations to our current education system, then Betsy DeVos’ appointment as Secretary Of Education is indeed a threat. If we look ahead to serving 21st-century students in an inclusive setting where teachers, parents and other stakeholders are challenged to do their best, then she is indeed a great choice. Follow Betsy on Twitter.

Jose Manuel Gonzalez Political Aspirations And Public Rights

Jose Manuel Gonzalez is Ph.D., M.Phil. And M.A in Economics from the University of Columbia. His professional record is a mixture of the private sector responsibilities, central bank decision-making, advisory positions as well as academic experiences. In 1988, he became a professor through the appointment of economics at the University of Columbia. In addition to that, he has taught advanced courses in the analysis of economics at the commercial center of studies in public policies in Madrid as well as other research institutes. He was again a professor in the business school in 2012 in IESE.

From 1985 to 1994, he became an economic advisor to the public as well as private institutions that include the bank of Espana. He was also an advisor to the European Commission, the World Bank Group as well as the IMF. He has also been involved in the working group of economics in the financial matters at the International settlement bank and the Cooperation and development Economic Organization.

Jose Manuel Gonzales believes not in the conversations of the public rights but the practice of the civil rights. He is referring to the core values in reference, respect for public property rights, respect for the rejection and guarantees of the various forms of warlordism.

He says that messiahs in politics are not needed, or the fact that we can bet the country to the charism of the people that call themselves the saviors of the country. Political maturity of a leader is not measured not in the ability to give numerous speeches but in the things that the person has done and his past track record as well as the ideas that the people believe in. We need something else. We don’t need to convert and rally under one political leader that comes up at the last minute and give us numerous promises that we know he will fail because he has no track record of performance.

Jose Manuel has always been in attendance f all meetings of the national assembly. He is a full-time deputy. He feels he is proud of his wok to change his country. He has earned the respect in all his caucuses.